Rent Control is a government measure to regulate a property market. It regulates the maximum rent levels properties can be let at, rent increments and at times also disallows sales of tenanted properties, or restrictions for buyers of tenanted properties.
Countries like Germany, France, New York, Canada, and Scotland have implemented various forms of rent controls to maintain affordability and protect tenants. However, these measures often deter private investment, limit returns, and create uncertainty. For instance, Germany's Mietpreisbremse law caps rent increases, France limits rent hikes to inflation, and New York City's Maximum Base Rent system introduces uncertainty and potential income limits. Similarly, Canada's rent caps protect tenants. More recently, Scotland's emergency legislation was in the news for mishaps around their rent control ambitions. From experience, Rent Control measures exacerbate supply shortages and reduce market attractiveness failing their tenant protection goals.
The UK's private rental sector (PRS) faces escalating rents and a severe supply-demand imbalance. In 2023, rents surged by 6.2%, reflecting inflationary pressures and a housing shortage. Tax changes that discourage buy-to-let investments exacerbated this crisis, leading to the sale of approximately 183,000 rental properties since 2022.
The roots of this imbalance date back over a decade, with a consistent undersupply exacerbated by policies driving landlords out of the market. Historical data from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) has shown a persistent surplus of tenant demand over landlord instructions since 2012, directly contributing to the rise in private rents. Any rent control measures by future governments is likely to drive private capital out, putting further pressure on supply-side economics, and forcing governments to become property developers which in turn is likely to pressure public finances.
Rent control reduces the profitability of rental properties, which discourages private landlords and investors. This reduction in investment leads to a decrease in the supply of rental housing, exacerbating the existing shortage. The decreased supply, coupled with sustained demand, can result in higher overall housing costs and lower quality of available properties (Institute of Economic Affairs) (Institute of Economic Affairs).
Landlords facing capped rental incomes might reduce spending on maintenance and improvements. This neglect can lead to a general decline in the quality of rental housing, negatively affecting tenants and potentially increasing long-term costs for repairs and upgrades (Institute of Economic Affairs) (UK Housing Evidence).
Rent control can lead to market distortions, including mismatches between tenants and housing units. Tenants may remain in rent-controlled units that no longer meet their needs, such as single individuals occupying family-sized homes, reducing the overall efficiency of housing allocation (Economics Observatory).
The broader economy could suffer from reduced labour mobility, as high housing costs and limited availability deter people from relocating for job opportunities. This stagnation can impede economic growth and productivity. Additionally, high housing costs contribute to increased consumer prices, as businesses pass on the higher costs of commercial space to consumers (Institute of Economic Affairs) (Institute of Economic Affairs).
Past experiences with rent control in the UK and other western countries show that such measures often fail to achieve their intended goals and instead lead to long-term negative consequences for housing markets. For instance, the private rented sector in the UK drastically shrank under previous rent control regimes, only rebounding after deregulation (Institute of Economic Affairs).
Rent control might sound beneficial, but it’s a destructive force. It drives out private investment, ruins property quality, burdens the government, and distorts the market. The housing crisis will only worsen under rent control. Unless real estate is nationalised and governments take upon themselves, provision of housing as a benefit, private sector rent control does more harm than good.
The Renters Reform Bill proposes abolishing 'no-fault' evictions and limiting rent increases, with the Labour Party suggesting "rental stabilisation" tied to inflation or wage growth. Polly Simpson from Savills warns that regulatory certainty is crucial for attracting investors. However, ongoing reforms and potential rent controls may deter private and institutional investment in the resulting climate of uncertainty.
The prospect of rent controls in the UK presents a double-edged sword. While aimed at protecting tenants and stabilising rental markets, such measures risk unintended consequences that could harm the very fabric of the private rented sector (PRS). Ensuring a balanced approach that addresses both tenant protection and investor confidence is crucial. Policymakers must focus on increasing housing supply, incentivizing investment in the BTR sector, and reducing barriers within the planning framework. Only by addressing the root causes of the housing crisis can the UK hope to create a sustainable and equitable rental market for the future. A middle path could be to get UK Pension Funds to invest in long-term build-to-rent projects as pension funds financial returns’ requirements tend to lesser than that of private HNW investors and private equity funds who currently drive the PRS market.
As the debate continues, the primary focus must remain on fostering a market that attracts investment and ensures adequate housing supply, rather than solely relying on rent controls, which history has shown can lead to long-term market distortions and reduced housing quality. The UK housing market's ability to thrive depends on striking the right balance between regulation and investment, ensuring that private capital can continue to play a vital role in meeting the nation's housing needs.
Log In
Request Access
